It is unusual to see a politician vote against popular tax cut proposals in an election year. It is even more unusual to see a Governor put a mark on his back by vetoing a popular bill that the legislature has sent up to the executive to sign– there is no one else to hide behind or blame for its failure. However, in 2024, Wisconsin has a Democratic Governor with two years left until he is up for reelection, and an election-facing Republican majority legislature that is eager to claim a win for constituents with tax legislation aiming to keep more money in workers’ pockets. This posits an explanation for why Wisconsin’s Governor Tony Evers vetoed a series of tax legislation this week that included a significant income tax cut approaching $800 million, alongside other measures aimed at reducing tax burdens for married couples and retirees within the state.
The Intent Behind the Tax Bills

The Republican legislators argued that their proposed bills were designed to make Wisconsin a more enticing location for families, middle-income earners, and retirees. They believed that such tax cuts were essential for boosting the state’s attractiveness and economic vitality.
Democratic Opposition and Rationale

Despite these intentions, Democratic figures, including Governor Evers, contended that there were more effective methods to achieve these goals without resorting to sweeping tax cuts. They expressed concerns about the potential long-term fiscal impacts of these reductions on state finances.
Republican Leaders React

In response to the veto, prominent Republican leaders voiced their disappointment and criticism. Assembly Speaker Robin Vos accused Governor Evers of neglecting the middle class by refusing to support the tax cuts. Senate Majority Leader Devin LeMahieu went further, labeling the veto as indefensible, especially given the state’s substantial $3 billion budget surplus.
Focus on Retiree Tax Cut Veto

Senator Rachael Cabral-Guevara, who spearheaded the retiree tax cut bill, described the governor’s veto as a significant insult to Wisconsin’s elderly population. She argued that this move would disadvantage Wisconsin as a retirement destination.
Pending Decision on Child Tax Credit Bill

Another piece of legislation under scrutiny is a bill aimed at expanding a child tax credit, which has garnered bipartisan support. Governor Evers has until the following Tuesday to make a decision regarding this proposal.
The Controversy Around Income Tax Reduction

The vetoed income tax bill sought to expand the state’s second income tax bracket, thereby lowering the tax rate for a broader segment of the population. This move was intended to provide financial relief to individual and married filers alike.
Governor Evers’ Justification for the Vetoes

Governor Evers, in explaining his veto decision, referenced his previous endorsements of Republican-backed tax cuts targeting the middle class, such as a $2 billion cut in 2021. However, he criticized the current proposals as financially irresponsible and unsustainable.
Financial Responsibility and Sustainability Concerns

Evers expressed concern that the proposed tax cuts would undermine Wisconsin’s ability to fund essential services, including education, healthcare, public safety, and support for local governments. He emphasized the importance of fiscal responsibility in his veto messages.
Additional Tax Bills Vetoed

Beyond the income tax reduction, Governor Evers also vetoed proposals aimed at increasing the income tax credit for married couples and significantly raising the exemption on retirees’ income from state income tax.
The Implications of the Vetoes

By vetoing these bills, Governor Evers argued that he was protecting the state’s financial reserves and avoiding potential risks, such as the need to repay federal stimulus funds. This stance has sparked debate among legislators.
Republican Disagreement on Federal Repayment

Republicans have contested Evers’ caution regarding federal stimulus funds, doubting that the Biden administration would demand repayment from the state for enacting these tax cuts.
A Broader Fiscal Debate

The governor’s veto has ignited a broader conversation about fiscal policy in Wisconsin, highlighting the tension between tax reduction initiatives and the need to maintain robust funding for public services.
Looking Ahead

As Wisconsin navigates these fiscal debates, the focus now shifts to the remaining legislation on Evers’ desk and how these decisions will shape the state’s economic and social landscape in the years to come.