Language evolves as society progresses, reflecting deeper understandings and respect for diversity. Gen Z, known for championing inclusivity, has identified phrases that clash with contemporary values of equality and sensitivity.
This article unpacks a series of expressions that were once casual in speech but are now deemed inappropriate due to their underlying implications. By examining these phrases, we gain insight into the cultural shift towards a more respectful and inclusive dialogue.
“That’s gay”
Using “gay” as a pejorative term trivializes sexual orientation and perpetuates harmful stereotypes. Gen Z advocates for more inclusive language that respects individual identities rather than using them as insults. This phrase, once common in casual speech, is now widely recognized as offensive and outdated.
“Man up”
The phrase “man up” is criticized for reinforcing traditional, toxic stereotypes of masculinity, suggesting that showing emotion is a sign of weakness. It pressures individuals to conform to a narrow definition of strength and stoicism. Gen Z calls for a rejection of such phrases that promote harmful gender norms.
“No homo”
This term is used to assert heterosexuality after a statement that could be interpreted as homosexual, perpetuating the notion that being gay is undesirable. It reflects underlying homophobia and insecurity about one’s sexual orientation. Gen Z promotes a culture where no one feels the need to justify or qualify their affection or friendships based on fear of misinterpretation.
“That’s so retarded”
The use of “retarded” as an insult to something foolish or stupid is offensive to individuals with intellectual disabilities. This term has been rejected by new generations who prefer language that does not demean mental ability. Advocacy for respectful communication has led to its decline in use among younger people.
“I’d hit that”
“I’d hit that” objectifies the person it’s directed towards, reducing them to a target of physical desire without regard to their humanity or consent. It’s seen as degrading and sexist, contributing to a culture of disrespect and objectification. Gen Z encourages language that respects personal agency and dignity.
“Go back to…”
This phrase is a direct attack on someone’s ethnicity or national origin and is fundamentally xenophobic. It suggests that people are not welcome in a place based on their appearance or heritage. As global citizens, Gen Z rejects such expressions of intolerance and promotes diversity and inclusion.
“Boys will be boys”
This saying is used to excuse male misbehavior, particularly young ones, under the guise of natural male tendencies. It undermines accountability and perpetuates a culture of leniency around male misconduct. The younger generation advocates for responsibility regardless of gender.
“You throw like a girl”
Used to critique someone’s athletic ability, this phrase perpetuates stereotypes that women are inherently less athletic than men. It’s demeaning and contributes to gender discrimination in sports and physical activities. Gen Z champions equality in athletics and discourages language that suggests otherwise.
“Don’t be such a girl”
Implying that being a girl is synonymous with being weak or overly emotional, this phrase enforces harmful stereotypes about femininity. It’s used to demean anyone who shows vulnerability or sensitivity, regardless of their gender. Younger generations call for an end to such gendered insults.
“Are you blind?”
When used to criticize someone’s oversight or mistake, this phrase can be insensitive to those with actual visual impairments. Gen Z emphasizes empathy and the thoughtful use of language to avoid inadvertently offending those with disabilities. This awareness promotes a more inclusive society.
“Speak English”
Demanding someone to “speak English” in multilingual societies can be seen as culturally insensitive and exclusionary. It disregards the rich diversity of languages and the benefits of multilingual communication. Young activists promote linguistic diversity and the acceptance of all languages in public spaces.
“Just a joke”
Claiming something was “just a joke” is often used to excuse offensive remarks or behavior. It undermines the impact words can have, dismissing the feelings of those hurt in the process. Gen Z argues for accountability in humor, ensuring it doesn’t come at the expense of others’ dignity.
“Special snowflake”
This derogatory term is used to mock individuals who are viewed as overly sensitive or seeking special treatment. It invalidates legitimate grievances and discourages individuals from expressing their true selves or standing up for their rights. The younger generation values authenticity and understanding, pushing back against such dismissive language.
“It’s a free country”
Often used to justify offensive or controversial behavior, this phrase ignores the societal impact of one’s actions. It suggests a misunderstanding of freedom, implying it includes freedom to harm or disrespect others. Gen Z stresses responsible freedom—rights that come with consideration for the community and its values.
“Drama queen”
Labeling someone as a “drama queen” tends to trivialize their reactions or feelings as overblown or theatrical. This can discourage open emotional expression and perpetuate a culture of stoicism. Respect for genuine feelings and communication is a hallmark of Gen Z’s approach to social interactions.
“Get over it”
Telling someone to “get over it” minimizes their problems and can hinder genuine emotional support. This phrase implies that their issues are trivial and unworthy of attention, which can be isolating. Acknowledging and addressing emotional pain is valued over dismissive attitudes in today’s empathetic society.
“She wears the pants”
This phrase is used to describe women who are seen as the dominant partner in a relationship, implying that it’s unusual or improper. It perpetuates outdated gender roles where male dominance is the norm. Gen Z encourages equality in relationships, where power dynamics are not defined by gender stereotypes.
“That’s so OCD”
Casually using “OCD” to describe neat or meticulous behavior trivializes a serious mental health condition. Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder is a complex and challenging illness, not a quirky adjective for everyday tidiness. Respect for mental health issues and accurate language usage are increasingly advocated by younger generations.
“You people”
Using “you people” can be exclusionary and offensive, often targeting a specific racial, ethnic, or social group. This phrase creates division and perpetuates an “us vs. them” mindset. Advocates for ‘inclusivity’ aim to eliminate this phrase from common usage to foster unity and understanding.
“Failed attempt”
Describing someone’s effort as a “failed attempt” can be unnecessarily harsh and discouraging. It overlooks the value of effort and learning through failure. Encouraging a growth mindset, Gen Z prefers to recognize any attempt as a step towards eventual success.
“Lame”
Originally referring to someone’s inability to walk, “lame” has evolved into slang for something uncool or undesirable. This usage can be seen as ableist, as it derives from a term that denotes a physical disability. Younger people advocate for language that doesn’t inadvertently marginalize those with disabilities.
“That’s for girls”
This phrase is used to enforce gender stereotypes by assigning activities, interests, or behaviors to one gender. It limits personal freedom and expression, particularly for young men who may enjoy so-called “feminine” activities. Encouraging interests based on personal preference rather than gender is more aligned with Gen Z’s values.
“Grow a pair”
Implying that bravery or resilience is inherently masculine, this phrase is not only gender-insensitive but also derogatory. It suggests that courage is linked to male anatomy, excluding or demeaning those who don’t fit this narrow perception. Promoting courage and strength as human traits rather than gendered ones is essential in today’s discussions on gender equality.
