Special Counsel Requested Longer Deadlines For Trump’s Case, Signaling a Key Strategy Revision

Politics Donald Trump Rally 2018 Evan El Amin Shutterstock
image credit: Evan-El-Amin/Shutterstock

The Supreme Court’s ruling that former presidents enjoy broad immunity protections from criminal prosecution took the wind out of special counsel Jack Smith’s case against former President Donald Trump. Since the highest court announced its ruling, Smith and other prosecutors have strategized how to move forward in the new legal environment.

Smith’s Strategic Crossroads

Politics US Capitol Building S.Borisov Shutterstock
image credit: S.Borisov/Shutterstock

Smith is at a crossroads at more than one juncture regarding Trump’s case. His particular area of concern was Trump’s actions on January 6, 2021, during a riot at the U.S. Capitol.

Shift in Deadlines

Jury court legal law trial case Crazy City Lady Shutterstock
image credit: Crazy City Lady/Shutterstock

Last week, Smith asked for longer deadlines on the case, representing a significant shift for Smith, who had consistently sought to move the case forward to be tried before the November election.

Options for Narrowing or Broadening the Case

January 6 Riot US Capitol Building Politics lev radin shutterstock
image credit: lev radin/shutterstock

The immunity ruling put Trump’s actions on January 6 within the scope of potential, and even likely, Presidential immunity.

Smith must either narrow the scope of his prosecution to actions that Constitutional protection would not cover, seek an evidentiary hearing to expose the evidence against Trump to the public, or at least to the court, or he may choose to broaden his indictment to target not only the former President but other actors that day that the Constitutional immunity clause may not protect.

McQuade’s Perspective on Smith’s Strategy

Politics Court gavel balance law WESTOCK PRODUCTIONS Shutterstock
image credit: WESTOCK-PRODUCTIONS/Shutterstock

Former U.S. Attorney Barbara McQuade suggested that Smith might “choose the path of least resistance,” which is what she expected most prosecutors to do to resolve cases rather than allow them to become entrenched.

Involving Co-Conspirators

Lawyer court jury trial legal attorney defend prosecute Gorodenkoff Shutterstock
image credit: Gorodenkoff/Shutterstock

However, McQuade noted that Smith seems to be looking to involve the co-conspirators in the charges rather than significantly narrow his prosecution.

Potential Co-Conspirators Named

Former President Donald J. Trump Republican Politics lev radin Shutterstock
image credit: lev radin/Shutterstock

She said, “Initially, Jack Smith did not name them, I am guessing because he was hoping to streamline the case against Trump and get it done quickly because it was Trump who’s the threat to democracy.”

Names of Potential Co-Conspirators

Politics GOP Rudy Giuliani mark reinstein Shutterstock
image credit:mark-reinstein/Shutterstock

McQuade named the potential co-conspirators as Rudy Giuliani, John Eastman, Jeff Clark, Sidney Powell, Kenneth Chesebro, and Boris Epshteyn.

McQuade’s Take on Charging Other Defendants

symbol of law and justice court corgarashu shutterstock
image credit: corgarashu/shutterstock

McQuaid asserted, “Because there will be no trial [before the election], maybe he’s decided, ‘You know what, the time’s come, I’m just going to charge the other defendants.'”

Politics Supreme Court Law Judge washington Steve Heap Shutterstock
image credit: Steve-Heap/Shutterstock

Another significant legal issue in Smith’s case is the permissibility of evidence that conforms to the Supreme Court standard handed down in the immunity decision.

Official Acts Cannot Be Used as Evidence of Private Crimes

Law legal judgement legislation court Chinnapong Shutterstock
image credit: Chinnapong/Shutterstock

According to the court, evidence is inadmissible if it uses official acts to support charges not covered by presidential immunity. For example, prosecutors cannot rely on official acts as evidence to prove a charge regarding a private act.

Politics Supreme Court Justice Law Brandon Bourdages Shutterstock
image credit: Brandon-Bourdages/Shutterstock

This is also not a simple distinction for Smith and other prosecutors. McQuade highlighted that the prosecutors must find evidence that will pass the legal standard at both the district court level and withstand Supreme Court scrutiny upon potential appeal.

McQuade Explains the Dilemma

Court of Law and Justice Trial Judge Gavel Gorodenkoff Shutterstock
image credit: Gorodenkoff/Shutterstock

She said, “My guess is that’s the part that they’re struggling with.” McQuade explained, “What you don’t want to do as a prosecutor is win the battle and lose the war.”

“So you put up this great case, and you get all this evidence in, and there’s a conviction, and then ultimately it gets overturned because the high court says, ‘Oh, you know that one piece of evidence that you used about that statement Trump made? That was an official act.'”

Potential for a Minitrial

Former President Donald Trump politics Republican Evan El Amin Shutterstock
image credit: Evan El Amin/Shutterstock

A final option for Smith is to push for a minitrial to lay bare all the evidence for the court and public to see.

Despite the fact that no decision will be made in the case prior to the election and likely even the inauguration, Trump’s opponents would like to see all evidence presented against him by prosecutors as the next best thing to a conviction. This could potentially be accomplished before the election.

Total
0
Shares
Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Previous Post
Hospital bed patient doctor surgery DwiAyuPuspitasari Shutterstock

Probiotic Supplements Linked to Fatal Infection in Japanese Hospital

Next Post
World Health Organization WHO Michael Derrer Fuchs Shutterstock

Mpox Outbreak Declared Global Health Emergency as Congo Cases Exceed 14,000

Related Posts