Facebook/Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg sent a letter Monday to the House Judiciary Committee expressing regret that he had not been more forthcoming and vocal about the pressure exerted upon his enterprise by the federal government regarding content regarding COVID-19.
Biden-Harris Administration Pressure

The technology billionaire said in his bombshell letter that the Biden-Harris Administration “repeatedly pressured” his company to “censor” content in 2021.
Zuckerberg’s Regret

Zuckerberg wrote to House Judiciary Chair Jim Jordan, “I believe the government pressure was wrong, and I regret that we were not more outspoken.”
Commitment to Content Standards

He continued in his letter, “As I said to our teams at the time, I feel strongly that we should not compromise our content standards due to pressure from any Administration in either direction–and we’re ready to push back if something like this happens again.”
Example of Content Demotion

As an example in the letter, Zuckerberg cited a story that Meta “shouldn’t have demoted” and that featured allegations of corruption against the Biden family in the days leading up to the 2020 election.
Meta’s Fact-Checking Policies

Meta said that the story was demoted only as fact-checkers verified the facts in the article.
Policy Changes at Meta

However, according to Zuckerberg, Meta’s policies and procedures have changed, and stories awaiting fact-checking are no longer demoted.
Zuckerberg’s Stance on Election Donations

Unlike the last election cycle, Zuckerberg told the House Judiciary Committee that he would not be making donations during this election cycle, which would impact election infrastructure.
Controversy Over “Zuckerbucks”

His donations in the past election have proven controversial, though they were intended and “designed to be non-partisan.”
Accusations of Bias

Critics have accused the “Zuckerbucks” of being distributed unfairly to benefit liberal jurisdictions.
Zuckerberg’s Defense

Zuckerberg went on the record with his letter, saying, “Despite the analyses I’ve seen showing otherwise, I know some people believe this work benefited one party. My goal is to be neutral and not play a role one way or another–or even to appear to be playing a role.”
Republican Response to Zuckerberg’s Letter

In receiving the bombshell letter, the House Judiciary Committee Republicans claimed the message was a “big win for free speech.”
GOP’s Statement on X

On X, the GOP Judiciary Committee released the following statement, “Mark Zuckerberg just admitted three things: 1. Biden-Harris Admin “pressured” Facebook to censor Americans. 2. Facebook censored Americans. 3. Facebook throttled the Hunter Biden laptop story.”
Zuckerberg’s Pledge for Election Integrity

The Committee also posted on X, “Mark Zuckerberg also tells the Judiciary Committee that he won’t spend money this election cycle. That’s right, no more Zuck-bucks. This is a huge win for election integrity.”
Great blog post.Really looking forward to read more. Great.
Viele der neuesten Anbieter bieten exklusive
Evolution-Tische mit lokalen Features. Klassiker
wie Dead or Alive oder Starburst XXXtreme tauchen fast überall auf, oft ergänzt durch aktuelle Titel mit überraschend hohem Unterhaltungswert.
Neue Casinos laufen direkt im Browser und bieten auch mobil
vollständigen Zugriff auf Slots, Tische
und Aktionen. Deshalb bieten längst die meisten Spieleplattformen eine eigene mobile Casino App – zumindest als Web-App –
an. Vielmehr geht es darum, dass ihr auch nach eurer Ersteinzahlung wertgeschätzt
werdet. Außerdem gibt es zunehmend neue Online Casinos, die Zahlungen via Bitcoin anbieten.
Wildz steht auf der Whitelist der GGL und darf somit virtuelle Spielautomaten legal in Deutschland anbieten. Für Bestandskunden gibt es regelmäßige Missionen und Turniere, bei denen du dir immer wieder mal zusätzliches Bonusguthaben oder Freispiele sichern kannst.
Gleich zu Beginn gibt es einen Neukundenbonus mit 100% bis zu 100€
References:
https://online-spielhallen.de/umfassende-vegas-casino-erfahrungen-mein-leitfaden-fur-spieler/